by
Shaun Sayers
on Mon 04 Feb 2008 01:01 PM GMT |
Permanent Link
|
Cosmos
Understanding
Deming is probably not as common as "Misunderstanding Deming". Follow
this link to
Scott Hassler's excellent summary. This article impressed us for a couple of reasons. Firstly it is well written and it is summarised succinctly, which makes it easy to read. Secondly it identifies the
"management approach" to managing quality that
Deming espoused. One of the more common misapprehensions about Deming (especially true of people who learn he was, by trade, a statistician) was that
Deming took a
"quality approach" to manging quality. Not true at all.
Deming understood the human factor, practical realities and the nature of systems. He was aware not only of the value of things like training and procedures, but also of the limitations of both
And also check out point "G" in his post - to achieve quality there is no substitute for knowledge - but also remember that a lot of crucial information is not only unknown, but
also unknowable.
On an unrelated matter, (just because it also caught our eye) you could check out
this little article on
Sith Sigma. It poses an interesting conundrum.
"Is it better to be right, or to be persuasive?" Now
THAT'S an interesting question ...