In an F.U.R.B (sort of) to our posting of November1st, we make a serious point about why you shouldn't take things so seriously.   more »

At the risk of upsetting a load of engineers who think that they actually are innovators, here's a post that suggests it goes against the grain   more »

Ah, now, here's a story we like. A bit different you might say. Neuro-marketing. What's that? Well, apparently, it's the scientific discipline that sits behind the process that makes a product cool... Hmmm, what sort of final inspections will we need for that quality characteristic..?   more »

This one's an enigma alright. On a philosophy and principles level everyone can buy into it. Apparently holistic, strategic in focus, results orientated, obsessed with cause and effect and continual improvement. So what's the problem? How come the practical reality of adoption often leaves us underwhelmed?   more »

Capable Blog does not take itself too seriously. Maybe it should. Quality is no laughing matter and many quality professionals are trained over a period of years, sometimes with sticks and buckets of cold water, to take things very seriously indeed. Best to be on the safe side. If this outlook on life is more your cup of tea, we may have just the forum for you ...   more »

Thanks to Rob for drawing our attention to this interesting thread on the isixsigma site. This is a recurring debate and (surprise surprise) capableblog has its own view on it. Fact is that the "either or" question completely misses the point as the two animals generally serve completely different purposes.   more »